Address
33-17, Q Sentral.
2A, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Kuala Lumpur Sentral,
50470 Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur
Contact
+603-2701-3606
info@linkdood.com
Address
33-17, Q Sentral.
2A, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Kuala Lumpur Sentral,
50470 Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur
Contact
+603-2701-3606
info@linkdood.com
Jamie Lee Curtis didn’t set out to become the face of the AI deepfake debate—she just wanted a bogus Instagram ad taken down. When Meta ignored her cease-and-desist, she publicly tagged Mark Zuckerberg and showed everyone how to reclaim control over their online identity.
An AI-generated commercial used footage and a manipulated voice of Curtis endorsing a dental product she never backed. After flagging the ad through official channels with zero response, she took to Instagram. Within an hour of tagging Zuckerberg, the ad disappeared.
Curtis’s fight sheds light on a growing wave of AI tools that can alter anyone’s image or voice—celebrities and private citizens alike. These deepfakes spread faster than platforms can remove them, exposing gaps in current content-moderation systems and fueling calls for better AI-detection measures.
In response to incidents like Curtis’s, experts and unions propose:
Curtis emphasizes that these safeguards must serve “everyone”—not just high-profile figures—to tame the “wild, wild west” of the internet.
Q1: How did Jamie Lee Curtis get the fake ad removed?
After her lawyers and agents saw no progress, she tagged Meta’s CEO on Instagram. That public call-out prompted an immediate takedown.
Q2: Why are AI-generated ads so hard to eliminate?
They can be created and reposted instantly using open-source tools, overwhelming moderation teams and slipping past automated filters.
Q3: What protections exist against deepfake misuse?
Beyond social platforms’ policies, unions like SAG-AFTRA and recent state laws are pushing for faster takedowns and legal penalties for deceptive AI content.
Sources Los Angeles Times