In July 2025, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) unveiled a bold plan: deploy artificial intelligence to eliminate half of all federal regulations by January 2026. The centerpiece is the DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool, which has already reviewed hundreds of regulatory sections at agencies like HUD and the CFPB.
But critics raise serious concerns about the tool’s reliability, legality, and impact on public services.

🚀 What Is the DOGE AI Deregulation Tool?
- Designed to scan approximately 200,000 federal regulations, the system flags ~100,000 rules as potentially obsolete or unnecessary.
- Initial pilot runs showed HUD reviewing over 1,083 regulatory lines in under two weeks.
- CFPB reportedly processed 100% of targeted deregulations using the AI tool.
- DOGE claims the effort could save trillions of dollars in compliance costs and unlock new private investment.
🧩 DIY Engineering: Who Built It?
- DOGE brought in software engineers, some from Silicon Valley with little to no federal experience.
- At HUD, a third-year college student was reportedly tasked with frontline AI regulation edits. There’s no clear framework of legal training or oversight.
⚠️ Major Concerns & Technical Flaws
- Inaccuracies detected: Similar flawed tools at the VA previously misinterpreted contract values—labeling $35,000 contracts as $34 million and flagging non-essential services wrongfully.
- Data risk: DOGE operatives reportedly uploaded sensitive personnel and VA benefit records into AI systems—raising alarms over privacy, compliance, and potential vulnerability to external access.
- Surveillance misuse: Allegations suggest AI is being used to monitor federal employees for political or ideological loyalty instead of productivity or compliance.
🏛️ Broader Impacts Beyond Regulations
- DOGE-led AI-driven cuts have coincided with mass federal layoffs—estimated around 200,000 jobs in the first 100 days of the second Trump term.
- Programmatic cuts include housing assistance claims, VA benefits centers, education grants, and environmental protections—some of which support vulnerable populations.
- DOGE has contracted or influenced agencies including HUD, Veterans Affairs, Education, EPA, SEC, and the Small Business Administration.
👁️ Oversight & Legal Gray Areas
- DOGE is officially a temporary cross-departmental organization with murky personnel structures. Its funding ($40 million) and operations are shielded from transparency.
- There’s outstanding concern over whether the President has constitutional authority to bypass public review and eliminate so many regulations without legislative input.
- Federal privacy laws like the Privacy Act of 1974 may have been violated through unchecked data sharing across DOE, OPM, USDA, and others.

✅ What Happens Next?
| Area | What to Watch |
|---|---|
| Legal | Courts may challenge unilateral deregulation without public rulemaking |
| Accountability | Transparency into AI logic and oversight will be demanded |
| Data Protection | Evidence of misuse may trigger privacy lawsuits under federal statutes |
| Public Response | Stakeholder pushback may come from advocacy groups, unions, and DHS |
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How can AI determine which regulations to cut?
The tool uses a mix of data parsing, legal-text comparison, and heuristic scoring. But without domain expertise baked in, misinterpretations are frequent.
Q: Are AI decisions legally enforceable?
Not yet. Many deregulatory proposals still require agency review, public comment, and legal vetting before they can take effect.
Q: Could essential programs be lost?
Yes. Past AI implementations misflagged VA service contracts and could threaten public benefits or safety nets without human oversight.
Q: Who oversees DOGE?
It’s led by an acting director and maintains tenuous ties via embedded staff. Despite IRS-like access, it remains opaque and lightly regulated.
Q: Is this the future of government?
Probably not—critics argue it’s a risky, unregulated experiment that may trigger judicial or legislative pushback if essential services or civil liberties are undermined.
🔍 Final Thoughts
DOGE’s ambition—to lop off half of U.S. regulations through an AI tool—is historically unprecedented. Though the economic rationale might appeal to budget hawks, it unfolds amid serious concerns about legality, accuracy, and governance. The risks of flawed automation are not theoretical—they threaten real services, privacy, and public trust.
Without a transparent, accountable framework, this AI-led deregulation drive could become a cautionary tale, not a model for the future.

Sources The Washington Post


